Skip to main content

Not man enough for this job?

The male brain (google images)
Last week, El’Jai Devoureau in New Jersey filed a discrimination lawsuit against his former employer. El’Jai claims he was unfairly fired from his job as a urine monitor when his boss found out that he is transgender. 

Only a man is allowed to do the job, which is to monitor men taking urine samples at a drug treatment centre, in order to ensure that people recovering from addiction do not substitute someone else’s urine for their own during regular drug testing. 

But that is not the issue – it is perfectly legitimate for certain jobs to favour one group over another – for instance preferring women nurses in maternity wards. The issue here is whether or not El’Jai is in fact a man. He was born physically a woman, but has identified himself as a man all his life. In 2006 he had sex-change surgery, and now has a new birth certificate and driver’s licence that confirm his gender as male. El’Jai argues that he is a man, and his firing constitutes discrimination.

The court will have to decide whether or not El’Jai is a man. This is a line-drawing exercise, as are so many cases that I’ve come across in law school. What does it mean to be a man or woman, and where do you draw the line between the two? In order to help with tricky issues like these, the court will often give a list of relevant factors to consider and whichever side the balance leans towards, that’s your answer.

The court should do the same thing in El’Jai’s case. Here is a 7-factor test the court can use to determine whether or not El’Jai is a man:

1.       Does he leave the toilet seat up?
2.       Does his idea of a balanced meal consist of beer, wings and pizza?
3.       Is he unable to ask for directions?
4.       Does he hate shopping?
5.       Does he not understand women?
6.       Does he shout at the TV when the game is on?
7.       Is his mind occupied with a certain few things (see diagram above)?

If El’Jai answers affirmatively to all the above factors, he meets the criteria and congratulations – he’s a man!



Popular posts from this blog

Guy Rejected From Law Society

The end of law school is in sight- my exams start next week and by the end of April I will be a Western Law graduate!
In order to obtain my licence to practice law in Ontario, the next step is for me to write the Bar exam in June and complete 10 months of articling- then I’ll be admitted to the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) and will finally be a qualified lawyer.
But as Ryan Manilla has learned, meeting those two requirements doesn’t guarantee admission into the law society. Manilla is a graduate of Osgoode law school who was recently rejected from the Law Society for failure to meet its “good character” requirement.
According to the Toronto Star, Manilla was president of his condo board but got into a dispute with members over fee increases. He sent threatening emails to other members, and boasted that he got a thrill out of making other members squirm. He was kicked off the board; he forged a letter pretending to be a private investigator alleging kickbacks and other wrongdo…

Is the Federal Government’s Proposed National Securities Regulator Constitutional?

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will release its answer to this question tomorrow. The federal government posed the reference question to the court: is securities regulation subject to provincial or federal jurisdiction as set out by the Constitution Act, 1867?

The Constitution Act sets out the division of powers, which determines what issues are under the control of the provinces- like education health- and what things are governed by the federal government- such as criminal law and copyrights. In reality there is a lot of overlap between the two.
If securities regulation is a matter of “property and civil rights”, it is subject to provincial jurisdiction. If it is a matter of “trade and commerce”, it will fall within the domain of the federal government. 
Not all the provinces are happy with the idea of a nationwide securities regulator, which was proposed by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty in May 2010. In fact, Ontario seems to be the only province supporting the propose…

‘Stand Your Ground’ Law: Legitimate defense or license to kill?

Last month 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot and killed by George Zimmerman, a neighbourhood watch volunteer in Florida who saw the African American teen wearing a hoodie, found him suspicious, and ended up killing him. Zimmerman invoked the “Stand your ground” law in his defense and has not been arrested.
Under this law, Florida Statute 776.013(3), a citizen who is attacked has no duty to retreat, and can use deadly force if he/she reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or another, or to prevent a felony. It can be seen as an extension of the law that allows a person to use deadly force if his home is being attacked.
The point of this law is supposedly to allow people to protect themselves without worrying about being put in jail. But it seems it can also function as literally a ‘get out of jail free’ card for homicides that would not otherwise be justifiable. The law has been invoked 130 times in Florida since it was passed in 2005 - of…