Skip to main content

Is the Federal Government’s Proposed National Securities Regulator Constitutional?

Image from The Lawyers Weekly

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will release its answer to this question tomorrow. The federal government posed the reference question to the court: is securities regulation subject to provincial or federal jurisdiction as set out by the Constitution Act, 1867?

The Constitution Act sets out the division of powers, which determines what issues are under the control of the provinces- like education health- and what things are governed by the federal government- such as criminal law and copyrights. In reality there is a lot of overlap between the two.

If securities regulation is a matter of “property and civil rights”, it is subject to provincial jurisdiction. If it is a matter of “trade and commerce”, it will fall within the domain of the federal government. 

Not all the provinces are happy with the idea of a nationwide securities regulator, which was proposed by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty in May 2010. In fact, Ontario seems to be the only province supporting the proposed system. Courts in Alberta and Quebec have already ruled that the proposed Act is constitutionally invalid.

Flaherty argues that not having a national regulator hurts Canada’s reputation internationally and that a single national regulator would fix the fractured system that currently exists. Critics have pointed out that a national regulator in the US failed to prevent the economic crisis of 2008.

I predict the SCC will rule that securities regulation falls within federal jurisdiction, and that a national securities regulator is therefore constitutional. This may ruffle some feathers, as provinces are loathe to cede power to the federal government, but there comes a time when politics should perhaps yield to what may be in the best interests of our country as a whole.


  1. I was wrong. The SCC declared the proposed Act unconstitutional.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Science of Happiness Explained

I'm at the Legal Marketing Association (LMA) 2018 Annual Conference in New Orleans, and almost skipped the keynote session - because an hour-long talk about happiness sounded irritating. But actually I didn't want to strangle the speaker at all. 

The Happiness Professor as she is known, is Catherine Sanderson. She teaches at Amherst College and has degrees from Princeton and Stanford. She presented research from the field of positive psychology that looks at the factors that do (and do not) predict happiness, and provided practical ways that we can increase our own psychological well-being.
Things we think will make us happy, but really don’t: Money. (Note: for people worried about survival, this doesn’t apply.) But beyond that, the more of it one has, the more one wants. 
Climate. Not convinced about this one. As a person who has been living in Florida for 6 years, from Canada, I can tell you that she may have gotten this one wrong. 
Life event. In other words, when X thing happ…

The new year’s resolution every associate should make

Our firm's associates are a talented bunch. They graduated top of their class, have backgrounds as musical theater performers and soccer players, and are multilingual and multicultural. But brains and talent can only get one so far in today’s legal profession. Regardless of what their future career goals are - to make partner, start their own firm, join a government or nonprofit organization - everyone needs a roadmap to get where they want to go. Help your associates to make it their new year’s resolution to create a business development plan in 2018. Here’s how to coach them: Create a written plan. Writing down your goals makes you accountable to them and more likely to achieve them. Also, you get the satisfaction of crossing your action items off your list as you complete them. Find a sample template online and use it.   Don't fret that you have written down your goals and are now tied to them. Think of your plan as a living, breathing document, and correct course as you go.…

Book Review: Accelerating Lawyer Success

What does success look like in law firms? The authors, frustrated with the abundance of anecdotal evidence and lack of empirical evidence to answer this question, set out to solve it with research. Their findings are based on studies including a comprehensive, 75-item survey completed by 343 lawyers at U.S. AmLaw 100 firms. They examine, among other things, the differences between lawyers who made partner in less than 10 years and those who didn't.
Accelerating Lawyer Success: How to Make Partner, Stay Healthy, and Flourish in a Law Firm. By Lori Berman, Heather Bock, and Juliet Aiken. 

The authors have uncovered the recipe for how to make partner in less than 10 years. In short, it involves hard work and quality work, strategic relationship building, planning, help from mentors, and a mind-set of being the master of your own fate. You gotta build relationships strategically, invest in them, and leverage them. You need goals, to make plans, and to stick to them for the most part. An…